|
Post by coffers on Feb 19, 2007 10:26:42 GMT
That's not good, but it could have been worse.
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Feb 19, 2007 10:46:49 GMT
The word you were looking for, Coffers, is "shite".
Nice work on the lulling/lurking tactic though, s1ut. I like that approach. Just a shame Lucy Liu and her lawyers don't....
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Feb 19, 2007 11:57:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Feb 19, 2007 14:48:31 GMT
You'll beat the turtles no bother. That's some great tipping there.
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Feb 19, 2007 15:55:08 GMT
I had more faith in his abilities than he had ability, obviously. :humb:
|
|
|
Post by Sonic on Feb 21, 2007 3:27:13 GMT
Coffers, can you run a book please?
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Feb 21, 2007 8:21:57 GMT
I'll leave that to Ladbrookes, they're so much better at it than me.
|
|
|
Post by Sonic on Feb 21, 2007 23:25:30 GMT
I'll leave that to Ladbrookes, they're so much better at it than me. Boo. You made some good predictions earlier :moop:
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Feb 22, 2007 8:36:41 GMT
Only for people who I'd end up paying out to. :checkit:
|
|
|
Post by Mr Bismarck's Electric Donkey on Feb 22, 2007 8:45:59 GMT
Pantfish Primates vs Terror Squad HCWhen I started in this game, I looked at the training options and then at the collection of numpties playing in my division and decided I was going to try to get promoted without buying anyone, in the hopes I'd be sitting on a pretty pile of cash in Division Three next year. The plan has a flaw though, in that at soon as we run into someone who knows what they're doing, we're in trouble. So it is that when we finally play a team that realises our sport is "H" and not "F", we're doomed. We were down 3-0 by the end of the second period and being skated off the ice by the silly-named Terrors and dropped to 4-0 behind just two minutes into the third period. With four minutes to play we squeaked a consolation goal to make it 4-1, but then things got really interesting as we scored twice in the next 95 seconds to close the gap to one and give us a real chance of stealing a point if we could take another chance! Which we couldn't. Our second loss in a row. Still, at least the whole money thing is working out.
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Feb 22, 2007 8:56:15 GMT
That's a crap graph. Did you get Boony to do it?
Unlucky in finding someone who knows what they're doing, s1ut. So is that the end of the season then?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Bismarck's Electric Donkey on Feb 22, 2007 9:15:46 GMT
I don't think so. There are lines all through the standings table, which makes about much sense as the mushrooms and cocaine-sponsored fifth divisional, regional, in Brazil.
Either two teams go up with three in a play off, or nine teams get relegated.
|
|
|
Post by Boony on Feb 22, 2007 9:23:58 GMT
Mushrooms and cocaine? Reminds me of a New Years Eve party I attended in Oxford a couple of years ago. A few of us were on 'shrooms, while the rest of them were on coke. An interesting mix, we had to get out of there before 12 to find some outdoors-type place. We found a bench by a river, sat there and saw all the fireworks in Oxford go off at once. Amazing sight.
Um, unlucky on the hockey, s1ut. I like the graph though. :thumb:
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Feb 22, 2007 9:39:28 GMT
I congratulate you on your choice of game, with a stupid league system that would take a Masters degree to work out. As for your current form that is crap but well done on the comeback attempt.
As for the graph, you haven't used enough colours.
KUTGW! :thumb:
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Feb 22, 2007 10:21:19 GMT
Real life Hockey "leagues" normally have about 203 teams playing in one sort of play-off or other and one team sitting at home drinking their collective Horlicks.
|
|