|
Post by Mr Bismarck's Electric Donkey on Jun 7, 2006 14:28:12 GMT
The draft order for the 06/07 season will be : 1 : Pabs 2 : DC 3 : Narkle 4 : Sonic 5 : Coffs 6 : Fuzzy 7 : Baz 8 : Moo 9 : elth 10 : s1ut Provided everyone signs up, of course, which Pabs may not, elevating DC to #1 overall, so he can fiddle with his boyfriend for the seventh season in a row. Any new teams wanting to come in will be inserted between elth and myself, so if that's 800 and Horn it's going to be a fucking tight squeeze. I have made a league with exactly the same roster as last year : 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 K, 1 DEF, 1 D, 3 Bench, but had thought about another league, with 1 QB, 1RB, 1 WR, 1 TE, 1 K, 1 DEF, 1 D and 1 WR/RB, with 2 Bench, which would expand the free agent market, as we don't seem to like trading, apart from 800. Scoring has been fiddled a little, to include a small bonus for runners and receivers who hit certain yardage targets and to peanlise defences who piss points, so that there is a penalty for someone who picks atlanta's a defence that lets in shed loads of points, regardless of how good their kick returns are. The new league under the existing rules is as followes : Name : Fishpond ID # : 42700 Password : myteamsucks The link to the yahoo fannyball stuff is here : fantasysports.yahoo.com/
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 7, 2006 14:59:06 GMT
So would this be a second league running, or one to replace the original?
|
|
|
Post by Mr Bismarck's Electric Donkey on Jun 7, 2006 15:08:09 GMT
It depends - if peope want to sign up for two, we can do two. If people like the sound of the 1-1-1-1-1-1 thingy and want to do that instead of the fuller roster, we can do that too. Basically I'm asking for ideas while DC is away.
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 7, 2006 15:39:48 GMT
Good shout.
I don't mind either because I'm brilliant and am going to win it this year.
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Jun 7, 2006 16:59:29 GMT
I don't mind either as I'm shoite and haven't got a clue what I'm doing so it doesn't matter. I'm only in it to badger people to hurry up in the draft.
|
|
|
Post by elth on Jun 8, 2006 8:11:57 GMT
Hurry up with the draft!
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 8, 2006 8:12:18 GMT
And a fine job you do of it too, Coffers.
Andre Johnson, s1ut?
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Jun 8, 2006 9:01:47 GMT
I cannae log into the league for some reason. It's a plot to keep me from exercising my number two pick. Bostords!
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 8, 2006 11:28:19 GMT
You'd only waste it Narkle, give it to me.
|
|
|
Post by hornet on Jun 8, 2006 15:28:13 GMT
Don't call it a comeback.
No really, don't.
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Jun 8, 2006 16:21:32 GMT
I cannae log into the league for some reason. Cannae? Have you converted to a Scotsman for the duration of the World Cup or something? That's why it won't let you in, it thinks you are Pops.
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Jun 8, 2006 17:11:17 GMT
Hmm .. it seems I might have been making a somewhat obvious (some might think) mistake. All sorted now. So we're all set. On with the moaning.
-3 points for an interception? Bollocks to that!
|
|
|
Post by elth on Jun 9, 2006 6:41:55 GMT
Stu's obviously planning on picking a QB behind a shitty O-line, so that he spends more time on his back than he does throwing to cornerbacks.
I wonder who it could be...
You put the League name in instead of the League ID# didn't you, Nark?
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Jun 9, 2006 7:07:17 GMT
Nope. I forgot we were a bunch of cheapskates and clicked on "Football Pro" instead of "Football".
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Jun 9, 2006 7:27:56 GMT
The Gadgies are back in town.
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 9, 2006 7:39:44 GMT
Boony is a no-show for this, so Hornet replacing Pabs gives us ten. Marvellous.
Is s1ut picking Mick Vick in rd #2 this season? Oh I hope so.
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Jun 9, 2006 8:02:40 GMT
Tough choice to decide who to pick with my #2 even if DC does pick a running back. (which I presume he will).
|
|
|
Post by coffers on Jun 9, 2006 8:05:41 GMT
Go on Nark go for Culpepper, you know you want to.
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 9, 2006 8:21:18 GMT
I'll tell you what, Narkle, I'll swap you for the #7 pick. Just for the first round.
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Jun 9, 2006 9:14:20 GMT
I'll trade you 1.2, 12.2 and 13.2 for 1.7, 2.7 and 3.7.
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Jun 9, 2006 9:16:19 GMT
Unless we're having a serpentine draft this time round in which case it will be 1.2, 12.9 and 13.2 for 1.7, 2.4 and 4.4
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 9, 2006 9:39:29 GMT
You're a funny guy, Narkle. Not as funny as a swift kick in the knackers, but almost.
|
|
|
Post by Narcizo on Jun 9, 2006 11:13:41 GMT
What's funny about that. A quick consultation of my draft pick value chart tells me that that's an equitable deal.
|
|
|
Post by Moo on Jun 9, 2006 11:22:40 GMT
I'm sure it is. Which is exactly why I'll refuse, thanks very much all the same.
|
|
|
Post by Mr Bismarck's Electric Donkey on Jun 9, 2006 11:35:43 GMT
If teh Hron comes back, then he'd pick nine, everyone form elth to DC moving up a slot.
Also, Narkle, you know DC's not picking anyone but Pointing.
|
|